Site Logo

Life of an Architect

  • Podcast
  • about me
  • Questions / Contact
  • F. A. Q.
  • Do you want to be an Architect?
  • Architecture Books+
You are here: Home / Guest Posts / Who Decides: Historically Significant or Landmark?

Who Decides: Historically Significant or Landmark?

July 20, 2011 by 3 Comments

Chicago is an old town, sorta.

I say that because technically speaking, Chicago’s buildings are 30, 60, 80 years old and only a small percentage can claim to be more than 100.  Chicago is old in the sense that the United States is very much still a young nation.  Our oldest cities and towns barely crack 200 years and if we’re really honest, most American cities in their current incarnation, are probably less than 60 years old.  Compare this to European cities which can boast 200, 300, 400 years even with various invasions, razings, fires and plagues.

.

Chicago Black and White

[Photo by Genie Bae]

As a relatively new (old) city in a relatively new nation, it’s not surprising that we’re still trying to figure out what to save and what to get rid of. What can be considered architecture that is significant enough or old enough to be preserved? In fact, what is the difference between a Louis Sullivan building, Soldier Field, University of Illinois Chicago and Prentice Women’s Hospital?  Why is an old bank on the west side of Chicago worth saving, but a Modernist icon, not saving? There are many people in the building industry on both sides of this argument, including many green professionals who argue that preservation and reuse are the most conscientious use of our natural resources.

To briefly (and in a very, very simplified manner) break down the argument for preservation versus the argument against preservation:

Preservationists believe that the cultural legacy of a population lies in its significant buildings. The building itself is as much of a part of the character of a city as the function it serves. For example, Prentice is not just a women’s hospital. Prentice is a unique example Modernist architecture that was the dominant building style of Chicago in the late 20th century. Prentice is part of Chicago’s legacy as the preeminent Modernist city of the 20th century.

Non-preservationists believe that buildings are not works of art, but personal property that must   fulfill a function. One the property no longer fulfills it’s function, the owner is within their rights   to alter or demolish the property. In the case of Prentice, the building was small and functioned poorly as a hospital. The rooms were impractically sized and the mechanical systems were outdated. Both hospital staff and patients were dissatisfied with the aging structure.

 

In these debates, oftentimes, it comes down to developers versus preservationists. In most cases, the preservationists lose. In a city like Chicago, where the citizenry inherited a vast architectural legacy, issues of preservation are constantly in the public eye. The public is quick to grasp the value of Louis Sullivan’s ornamentation on State St. but slower to understand that Bertrand Goldberg’s spare, concrete Prentice Women’s Hospital is just as preservation worthy.

Architects are often loathe to weigh in publicly on the value of preservation out of fear of losing future commissions.  Even architects who work within the preservation community often choose to stay silent when architectural landmarks are threatened, preferring to stay away from controversy and working on projects that have already received landmark status.  It’s a lose-lose situation for owners and architects who battle over preservation. In the case of Prentice, what are the chances that the owner, Northwestern University, is ever going to engage the services of a well-known architect again? Why would an owner, take the chance of hiring an architect to design an iconic building and in 30 years, possibly face another preservation battle? Losing a potentially rich client such as Northwestern University is a loss to the architects everywhere. Losing a landmark like Prentice is a loss to everyone.

Which brings us to the question, who decides “What is historically significant and What is a Landmark.”

This is usually where government intervenes, only Chicago has a new, unpredictable (also famously curt and foulmouthed) mayor for the first time in 25 years and the landmarks commission, for the first time, is completely devoid of preservationists and architects.  In the most recent hearings, Prentice was not even on the agenda for the committee despite a recent swell of public protest.  This could possibly be taken as a sign that there is a new pro-business sheriff in town regarding Chicago’s architectural legacy.

As the United States ages and more cities face preservation issues exacerbated by issues of climate change, developer, architect and preservationist battles are most likely going to increase in scale and frequency. While Prentice is the most recent public battle happening in Chicago, smaller scale battles are happening in communities throughout America. When you hear about towns fighting to preserve their “small town character,” it’s essentially the same preservation argument on a different scale.

I see both sides of the argument. Having worked in new construction, commercial interiors and in historic preservation, I am torn. I know that oftentimes, the flashiest buildings with the biggest name architects are the ones that are saved while the lesser known, but equally beautiful buildings by smaller architects are forgotten.  I am encouraged when I see brilliant adaptive reuse schemes and am reminded that the key to saving our old buildings is to make sure they are continually in use and vital to the community.

In the case of the Prentice Women’s Hospital, it may be too late.

Prentice Women's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois

[Photo by Jim Kuhn]

.

A special thanks to Genie Bae for sitting at the helm today. You can follow her musings on Twitter @EBArchDesign and please visit her website for more of her writings.

.

.

.

even better stuff from Life of an Architect

Ep 085: Design and Fabrication

114: Holiday Gift Guide for Architects (2022)

heard around the architectural studio #009

heard around the architectural studio #011

Modern Window Detail - The CHouse Modern

The Brick House Goes Thrifting

Christmas Cards from Famous Architects

Ep 156: Build a Better House

A Modern List of Dallas Texas
Batts, Blown, or Sprayed - What’s the Best Way to Insulate Your Attic?

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Filed Under: Guest Posts Tagged With: Architecture and Society, being a part of the design process, Guest post

Search Life of an Architect

Subscribe to Podcast

Apple PodcastsSpotifyAndroidiHeartRadioby EmailTuneInRSS

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

Apparel for Architects

T-Shirts for Architects - Bob Borson

Support for Advice or Guidance - or if you simply want to show appreciation for the content produced on this site

Thanks!
Other Amount
Project Reference or Support for Questions Answered:

Trending on Life of an Architect

Ten Cathedrals to see before you die
Architectural Graphics 101 - Symbols
Architectural Graphics 101: Cover Sheet
Architectural Graphics 101 - Reflected Ceiling Plans
Architectural Graphics 101: Finish Schedules
Architectural Graphics 101 - Window Schedules
Do you want to be an Architect?
Architectural Graphics 101 - Layers
Architectural Graphics 101 - Wall Types
Architectural Graphics 101 - Line Weight

My “Serious” Disclaimer

The complimentary advice provided on ‘Life of an Architect’ is based on an abbreviated examination of the minimal facts given, not the typical extensive (and sometimes exhaustive) analysis I conduct when working with my clients. Therefore, anything you read on this site is not a substitute for actually working with me. Following my casual advice is at your own peril … if you want my undivided attention, I would recommend hiring me. Cheers.

Pages

  • Comment Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Architecture Books+
  • about me
  • Questions?
  • F. A. Q.
  • Do you want to be an Architect?
  • Podcast

Life of an Architect | Bob Borson

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Archives of Awesomeness

Copyright © 2025 Life of an Architect

 

Loading Comments...